Tuesday, January 17, 2017
Bates College Hosts MLK, Jr. Day’s Activities
(This is the first of a two-pt. blog series)
I.
This is the day (January 16) our nation set aside a
holiday to celebrate and lift in respect, the memory & legacy of Dr. Martin
Luther King.
Bates College, in Lewiston, Maine, hosted a keynote
speech (given by Professor Kahlil Gibran Muhammed) as well as many break-out
workshops. The theme of the day was Reparations: Addressing Racial Injustices.
The call for reparations to African-Americans, descended
from slaves, in their relationship to their owners & slave identity, has
gained more & more momentum & critical attention has now aided the call
for reparations;
reparations, however, to be sustainable must be founded on a new
declaration of race in our culture, a new conversation, a new language, a new
social consciousness; in other words, the completion of the Oppressor-&-the
Oppressed experiment. So, education
about slavery and issues surrounding it, is the firm base that everything will
rest upon, including reparations.
In his keynote presentation, Professor & author,
Kahlil Gibran Muhammed, he noted that those who support reparations must be intentional about reparations for it to
be efficacious & meaningful to those whom it might benefit, as well as
legislators.
Dr. Muhammed observed that what is presently needed in
our culture, in terms of righting the social justice & criminal justice
worlds, is for Americans to move into a new threshold. Dr. King, said Dr. Muhammed, was passionate
about racism being a type of “cultural homicide.” We don’t need DOA.
Later, in his talk, Muhammed emphasized how President
Obama received the baton from MLK, Jr.
Perhaps this was one of Obama’s central, political axioms: America has
always been about seeing ourselves as one nation, from many, diverse lands all
over this planet. One common
understanding of our “oneness” is that when push comes to shove, we’d give our
lives for our brothers & sisters. We
have many, unspoken & spoken American values that we could agree to hold
these all with respect.
Hearing some of the above comments, some white folks
would respond, “Well, none of my ancestors owned slaves.” This statement is as incongruous as building
an outside brick barbeque, and you tell your buddy, “Well, we’re all set to go. Did you see all the bricks?” “Yes, I did, but that’s all that’s over
there, no sand, no tools, no iron for the grill—nothing but bricks!”
White people are often completely unaware about their
privilege, as white people, in our nation.
So, this is all about education.
First, we need accurate, and not skewed information & knowledge,
about racism, and every other “ism” you could think of.
©Christopher Bear-Beam January 16, 2017
Monday, February 2, 2015
Racism is a Feeling
Sometime back I attended a monthly dialogue session that
focuses on Anti-Racism, Racism & Discrimination. In our discussion, one of the group members
said something that stayed with me: Racism is a feeling.
Here are some rhetorical questions: please don’t give your
answers now, but simply listen to some of the questions:
§
What do you think of this statement (“racism is a
feeling”)?
§
Do you view it as true and accurate, or false and
inaccurate?
§
What are your reasons for believing the statement
to be true?
§
What are your reasons for believing the statement
to be false?
§
As I said the phrase racism is a feeling, did you notice any shifts in your body?
§
Were there places of tension, compression or release
that you felt in your body sensations?
§
A key part in this exercise is to listening discriminatively—this doesn’t
mean you listen for a way to gain information to use to discriminate against
someone.
Discriminative Listening is listening to someone’s hear/reading
between the lines; but you listen for both emotions and words contained in the
other’s communication. In this kind of
listening, we can engage our own empathic compassion for self & others, as
we listen. Pay careful attention to feeling words found in a person’s statements,
innuendos, & general conversation; this may be combined for one’s content,
and insures that we really understand what the person is saying, especially
those that are easily misunderstood.
Do you think adapting the phrase “Racism is a feeling” would be a helpful term to use in anti-racism
training? How about “Racism has many feelings? Think of your
own, and try it out?
Our goal here is to try to come to a common understanding on
the statement, Racism is a feeling. Another
way of getting at this is to take a very quick look at Brain Chemistry, since
it’s relevant for understanding this phrase.
I hope it’s also relevant in our everyday lives, too.
Human
Development
We when are growing as
children in this culture, or someone who is a citizen of another nation,
the Neo Cortex (NC) in the frontal lobe of the brain; for many people their NC
doesn’t fully develop until around eighteen years of age. The NC plays the role of language formation, so
when language is in the formation phase in youth, the role of the NC is
different than when one is older.
In the formative years of human
development, a child may not have the capacity for human language, but it has
to develop in a process of time.
However, all types of non-verbal communication are occurring. The child is exposed to many brief, or in
some cases longer, non-verbal messages, that are imprinted on one’s psyche or
unconscious—facial looks, smiles, mean looks, “be quiet” messages, positive non-verbal
& reciprocal positive regard statements, punishing looks, unspoken
non-verbal cues with underlying family or hidden messages, expressions of joy,
grief, sadness, anger, depression, acting-out behaviors, etc.
The brain somehow somehow stores these
messages, and as the brain continues growing, there are more and more of the
unconscious emergences; there is, of course, a parallel-running, language
acquisition and comprehension function of the NC. More unconscious data arises to manifest
itself in conscious ways and ordinary experiences. An individual’s self-reflective and
intentional application of new learnings appears to cement certain feelings
onto a template of everyday living.
The caveat here is that our
emotions may, in fact, need re-booting, customizing, and opportunities that lead
to personal expression of feelings and/or thoughts. What this also points to is the need to blend
both cognitive thoughts mixed with messages from the affective realm (a partnering of feeling & thought) for effective communication.
If this process is somehow
neglected, skipped, or is somehow incomplete, and doesn’t happen, it’s easy for
a human to get lost in past trauma, stuck in anger or resentment, and lose the
purpose for which she’s participating in the first place. Ending consequences may be that some medical
authorities will resist using the diagnosis of PTSD; there appears to be a
newly emerging notion that PTSD is no dream—it’s real and VA doctors are
certainly aware that PTSD harms soldiers & families. They understand, as do most professionals in
the health care field, that you can’t fool human nature, environmental hazards,
or medical technology and personnel.
A major field that we need to
understand a little about is that of cognitive-behavior theory; a systems view of racism we may consider is this: racism is a constellation of many feelings. Essentially, researchers and practioners
in this field theorize that all feelings/emotions naturally flow from
cognitions or thoughts in our brains.
There is a causal relationship to our cognitions and emotions. For example, a person’s Belief System is
formed from cognitions; cognitions may include interpreted facts, assumptions,
stereotypical thinking, inferences, opinions, biases, etc.
Cognitions trigger our emotional
infrastructure and catalyze us to get ready to feel various emotions coming up
into our conscious field. A metaphor
would be that emotions are our quality
control system. Their mental basis
is rooted in one’s cognitive schema.
Emotions that come up for air are signs for us to take note of so we can
take whatever appropriate action needed as a result of our emotional
intelligence, and either let it go, sit with it a while, dismiss it, deny it,
or merely observe the feeling.
Here’s another suggestion: what
if our phrase read Racism is a storage
area for multi-colored feelings. If
we use this as our premise we might ask “What colors could we give to the
various emotions in the constellation of racism?”
Copyrighted Christopher Bear-Beam February 3, 2015
Begging (American Style)
In far flung countries begging is a custom, our developing, American
definition, pieces of indigenous lands unless you have no land on which to
live.
In the U.S., in the big cities and maybe in rural areas, too, homeless folks beg for spare change, or
barter their work for food, etc.—on street corners, under viaducts, wherever
they can find empty space they occupy, squatters on public domains, their
weapons are signs of begging, only we are a little embarrassed by the term, and
sad faces,
I feel so sad for them, knowing I could just as easily be there
myself/entertaining the people in cars, now entertaining could equal begging,
American-style.
Immigrant workers stand on curbs or at busy intersections, in clumps,
they ain’t no chumps, they be just begging for a job today—survival
worries—take it one day at a time—that’s all the energy any of us has, what we
have now, not so fine, and furiously fine.
I’ve begged in Berkeley in the Mid-Sixties—easier then, because I was
selling the Berkeley Barb, the daily
news of dissent.
Now I’m begging for people to buy my poetry, or my leather
products—cut off/cut off unemployment benefits due to a label given to me by
the State—misconduct—it’s done, not filling a monthly quota is misconduct,
rather hostile & abrupt, scheduling problems, targeted by the political
system of an entity whose stated aim is to deal ethically, they hide beyond the
wall, wrapped in gauze of serving the needs of the Mentally Ill/no surprise.
What about my needs for dignity and equity and justice? I also have a Mental Health diagnosis, don’t
I count? Can’t learn anything when my
boss threatened to kill me in her multiple-personality way, PTSD re triggered,
I’m awash in symptoms. Was this my fate
or my Karma?
So, now, no coins jingling in my pockets, or bills in my wallet,
unless I sell my poetry, you see, by begging, American-style, luckily as a poet
I have my craft, my greatest earthly joy/my products are me. It’s a trip when you’ve had a job all your
life, or most of it—now this prop has split, gone.
Selling my poetic discourse under a tree.
But what’s up with me? Lots of
black crow feathers in my mouth—tastes like one sick bird, lots of bending
& stooping and the humble pie is rancid vomit.
Everyone’s got to beg someday, so don’t be too proud to beg, OK? Good to give away all you got, good to
receive as well.
Thursday, October 23, 2014
Monoculture Crisis
I write about Conflict Resolution, but I think there are many
inter-woven roots of Conflict Resolution; some you can see because they’re
visible and above-ground, and some you can’t see because they’re often
invisible, unseen because of ventilating and creating underground.
In the scheme of things, Conflict Resolution has much to do with culture
and how inter-cultural relationships function either in unhealthy or
healthy ways. Culture is much more than
just the kind of language spoken. It
consists of many, multiple layers upon layers and social conditioning upon
social conditioning elements. The fact
that it has so many variables means that conflicts and embracing, death and
life, separation or diversity, etc. are all part of the gift-wrapped package.
If you leave Austin, you can go out to the wilds, forests, state
parks, and national parks, and view the micro-culture of a chosen
ecosphere. Here, you don’t find places
that have the same kind of plant or tree lined up, military style, standing at
attention, and getting ready to salute the top dog. No, in the wild, you see chaos, destruction,
thriving and growing, going through evolutionary growth development, there’s a
general messiness in any kind of healing-- galore! You see randomness, a natural graffiti of
flora and fauna colors, leaving their colored pollen to remind us of their
presence, because we are all interdependent beings, joined in the circle of
life, and dancing crazily on the edge of a forest fire.
“Monoculture—the practice of replicating a single plant, product or
idea over a huge area—is about the most unstable, unsustainable, unimaginable
form of organization that exists, but in the short term it keeps the system
running smoothly and keeps the power in the hands of a small number of people” (P. 1, The Icarus Project: www.theicarusproject.net, “Friends Make the Best Medicine: A Guide to
Creating Community Mental Health Support Networks”—you can obtain copies of this book free of
charge by going to the website above).
Living in a Monoculture means you want everyone else to be a carbon
copy of you. A Multi-Culture celebrates
and respects difference, diversity, the freedom and dignity of each person
individually, an equality-fueled partnering, an avoidance of the Doctor (once
known as the supreme expert, infallible
god with scalpels, icon, distant, often unapproachable and acting without much
humility, monologic communication, often acting as if superior to a patient (a
peer?) and family members, as if they are somehow separate, “better than,”
“grasping for control,” etc. Do any
of these images resonate with you?
Monocultures are not conducive to life, and generally within natural
systems you see Multi-Cultures living and breathing interdependently. In Monoculture, primarily in Western
Democracies is a way that wealthy people and systems control and exploit
others. “Powerful people figured out
awhile (sic) time ago that it’s a lot easier to control things if everyone’s
eating the same foods, listening to the same music, reading the same books,
watching the same TV shows, and speaking the same language. This is
what we call the Monocult, and while
everyone is supposedly more and more connected by this new ‘”global culture,”’
we’re more and more isolated from each other.” (Ibid.,
p. 1).
The
Icarus Project is both a pioneer and an outgrowth of a
psycho-social wave that is now growing and picking up steam. This is a
peer-based model of recovery that functions on the basis of self-empowerment,
self-transformation, and supportive community; it’s known by various names
(Peer Support is perhaps the most common), but suffice it to say that many are
concerned and disillusioned about the old school Medical Model that’s built on
an hierarchal, up-down, doctor as boss/patient as servant. Many individuals and organizations are
resisting how the Medical Model runs counter-intuitively and out of alignment
with the natural systems in which we live.
These people are rising up in diverse ways to use their voice to
clearly and personally state their own identity, and to offer peer resources
and initiatives to those with Mental Illness, many who have been very damaged
by the current rigid model of The Medical Model.
So we have a perfect set-up for conflict, right? Yes, that’s true: and we also have a perfect
set-up for psycho-social-creativity to
work. It’s good for us to remember
that one of the powerful, growth-producing phenomenon that dynamically is a Conflict>Creativity>Transformation>Conflict>Creativity>Transformation
cycle that continuously re-images and reformulates itself, changes,
flows, takes two steps back, lacks permanency, is randomly impacted by
conditions, causes and effects, is simply a part of the life-death process,
opens us up to our incredible mind-bodies capacity for mindfulness and
awareness, etc.
We are
not victims, we’re not weak, disassociated or unthinking; we base our view of
reality on empirical facts, not what we ever always think about facts or
scientific laws or functions of living, but
our experience that speaks to other listening voices, and is our credibility
and legitimacy that we own and use. Our stories ride out our path of
self-expression as well as journey us towards fulfillment of our human
potential. Our stories have the power to
heal us and send out the energy that is available for any healing on this
planet to take place.
I urge you to check out the Icarus Project Website (www.icarusproject.net). They offer resources that clear-mindedly
give meaning to our humanism, our return to the garden of humanity, and the ecstasy
and dignity of human selfhood.
I am gathering information presently as I envision a group gathering
of those who have been negatively impacted and affected by the Monoclot in the
area of Mental Health and Mental Illness.
The group mission would be to offer a safe and confidential place for
folks to communicate their stories; if you, or anyone you know, have ideas,
creative inspirements, input, questions, would like to be a part of this kind
of group, etc. Please email Christopher
Bear-Beam at sunbear.com@gmail.com.
© Christopher Bear-Beam January 2, 2014
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
Monoculture
Two people square off in a conflict. One of them throws out a hailstorm of words,
hisses, with a trance-like look in his/her eyes in an all up in your face attitude.
The other person decides to take what could appear to be very vulnerable
tactic, weak & gentle tone of voice, along with an understanding look in
the individual’s eyes. This response only made the other person angrier,
because he/she was pissed off because the other person wasn’t angry like he/she
was. “C’mon dudes fight will you?”
“You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours.”
“If you can’t make someone think as you do, make that person do as you think.”
"A half a loaf is better than no loaf at all.”
“A bird in the hand is better than two in the bush.”
“The best way of handling conflicts is to avoid them.”
“Avoid foolish & ignorant disputes, do not generate strife.”
“Speak softly and carry a big stick.”
“He who runs away lives to fight another day.”
“Might overcomes right.”
“Justice will prevail.”
“Truth is mightier than the sword.”
“Tit for tat is fair play.”
“Kill your enemies with kindness.”
“There is nothing so important that it is worth fighting for.”
“The squeaky wheel gets the grease.”
Albert Einstein told us years ago, ‘The only way you can solve a problem is to find a creative solution that is more powerful than the original cause. Otherwise you end up with the same kind of dilemma.’
Often we find that we are the ones who are stirring up
the conflict; as someone has said, ‘a little bit of sugar works much better
than a little bit of vinegar, not that the person in the above scenario would
have to use the method used to solve a conflict.’ To better understand what
may, or may not be, happening, we need to define conflict. In fact, if we
don’t have clarity on the nature of conflict, much less on how we may define it
in a sentence, can we really expect the resolution of conflicts in our
lives? Probably not. There must be the
“heart” and moxie to “get it” at all
levels of our humanity.
In his book, Conflict
Resolution and Mediation for Peer Helpers, Don Sorenson, PhD., lists some
phrases we may live by in terms of the way we typically react to conflict:
“Come
and let us reason together.”
“You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours.”
“If you can’t make someone think as you do, make that person do as you think.”
"A half a loaf is better than no loaf at all.”
“A bird in the hand is better than two in the bush.”
“The best way of handling conflicts is to avoid them.”
“Avoid foolish & ignorant disputes, do not generate strife.”
“Speak softly and carry a big stick.”
“He who runs away lives to fight another day.”
“Might overcomes right.”
“Justice will prevail.”
“Truth is mightier than the sword.”
“Tit for tat is fair play.”
“Kill your enemies with kindness.”
“There is nothing so important that it is worth fighting for.”
“The squeaky wheel gets the grease.”
Albert Einstein told us years ago, ‘The only way you can solve a problem is to find a creative solution that is more powerful than the original cause. Otherwise you end up with the same kind of dilemma.’
“Would you just shut
up—don’t rock the boat and create a worse mess than we already have.”
“Would you just tell me
what you’re feeling right now—every time we have some sort of conflict, you go
into your silent-steaming. You’re like that for a couple of days,
and then you act like nothing happened.
You won’t talk and there’s no way I can pull your emotions out, anyway.”
“I am just going to go
home and pray about it. I’m not making
any move toward that jerk unless I see he’s beginning to change or move
forward. I have to listen to see if God
speaks. If he can’t do that, he’s
history in my book.”
The
Passive-Aggressive Activist: this kind of person has the
personality trait of always trying to befriend you, gain your approval, put you
in the spotlight, do everything you ask and MORE! But this PAA hides behind a “user friendly”
mask, and their motives are generally not in the “friendly” mode, but designed
to hurt, to steal some object or notion, to violate their family cemetery, often
defame, besmirch, libel you & your family, and, if they could, to destroy
you. The mask also hides the pirate’s
skull with a dagger in his mouth. Go
easy and do a lot of observing what’s happening in your own ecosphere. Back in the Nineties a book came out called
“The Clergy Killers,” and gave a general background of the mental health of
people who do this, and why they do it.
Here
are some questions based on my observations, in regards to authentically
defining the meaning of conflict for yourself:
1. Do
I try to win, to avoid losing in a conflict context and/or situation?
2. Do
I work endlessly & tirelessly at “not losing” and “beating the other dude
out as the winner.”
3. Do
I think & feel that I have a competitive nature? In what sorts of places or situations do I
feel triggered, then activate competition?
In what parts of my life does it emerge?
4. Do
I try to remain neutral during
conflict?
5. Do
I use avoidance in managing
conflict? Do I just do nothing? Do I stop listening, and check out emotionally (going into that expressionless, somnambulant
trance-of eyes that aren’t really there in that moment.
6. Do
I have a difficult time managing my anger in a conflict? If anger is a primary emotion what would
happen if I slipped and let it out in a conflict?
7. Can
you think of any more scenarios?
Consider these three
approaches when communicating with someone with whom you have a conflict:
1. An
important key is to mention specific actions or behaviors, as well as dates, to
whoever you may be engaged with in conflict.
Communicating & Positive Labeling can be used to view yourself more
from an elemental (earth, wind, fire & water, space? These are the
integers) lens, or in your expression to the other person of how his or her
behaviors has impacted you. Make sure
you include your feelings about it, too. How have you felt emotionally about
the conflict? What do you do normally about your feelings?
2. Next,
keeping your own communication posture congruent (here the forms of
communication match: the words & non-verbal communication are aligned and
not opposed by either forms of personal communication) towards the other
person, with some detachment, but never surrendering both yours and the others individual, personalized, human,
compassionate action and clear thinking.
Think
about these points the next time you’re traveling in a conflictual situation;
think of your own motives as well, because conflict resolution is all about
having the “heart” to deal with conflict when it comes,
©
Christopher Bear-Beam October 2, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)